Overview - Last updated - 26 July 2017 - Illegalities - Current Court Submission

How our Justice system works - Video - Give Us back Our Country

 

All law in the Commonwealth of Australia is inherited from that tradition. “Isaacs J”, speaking in the High Court of Australia in 1925, was speaking truly when he proclaimed Magna Carta to be ‘the groundwork of all our Constitutions’.

Our system of government began circa 1500 and is a Covenant System. The Covenant System which aspires to a higher authority than Man (one does not necessarily have to be religious to accept this). It originated in Jerusalem and came to Britain via Greece. It gave birth to English Common Law which King Alfred codified in the 9th century and which law was largely incorporated into Magna Carta 1215 (in force 1297) and our parliamentary system of constitutional government. This is a unique heritage as it has been our gift to the Free World upon which the parliaments in the great Dominions and the republic of the United States of America have been founded. This great company of free democratic nations in the world is basically one people at law – a force for stability in the world.

The Dictatorial System under the Will of the State originated in ancient Babylon and came to Continental Europe via Rome. It gave birth to Roman Civil Law which found expression in dictatorships and revolutions, in particular the French Revolution of 1789. Most of the nations of Continental Europe after World War II had new constitutions and it is the basic dichotomy, or division, between our English Common Law and the European Civil Law that has never been faced in this whole issue of Europe. The Treaty of Rome was designed around the temporary co-operation between France and Germany and Britain is lying on this bed which does not and never will fit, no matter how much deception goes on.

Our Constitution is not a codified constitution contained within a single document. It is based on the Common Law established by very special statutes, which in some cases predate our Australian ancestry in the 700 year-old British Parliament and in all cases remain above it in respect of prerogative acts or acts of those in power.

1 - The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution v Local Council
2 - 1988 State Bank Act 1988
2.2 - PURPOSE OF STATE BANK OF VICTORIA
3 - COMMONWEALTH INSTALMENT RECEIPT TRUSTEE
4 - 333 COLLINS STREET PTY.LTD. Current & Historical Company Extract
5 - 333 COLLINS STREET PTY.LTD. Satisfied Charges Extract
6 - Becton Corporation Pty Ltd vs Ticontinental and Commonwealth 15 feb 1991
7 - Becton Construction and Engineering Pty Ltd Vs SGIC And Anor-8 Jul 1993
8 - ABL-KOGAN.com LTD

9 - State Bank (Succession of Commonwealth Bank) Act 1990 (Vic)

 

WEBSITE - HOMEPAGE - PRINT FILE - 2017-09-06

 

Notice of Appeal - Summons - Dated 22 June 2017

Court Orders - Dated 23 June 2017

 

Written Submission in reply to the defendants dated 26 July 2017 - Download Print File;

-----------------------------------

-----------------------------------

-----------------------------------

-----------------------------------

-----------------------------------

-----------------------------------

 

Download the entire document set

PRINT-FILE-2017-09-16

 

 

Blu Nite - Background

 

Blu Nite, started December 2014 with enthusiasm and vision as a purveyor of really good coffee and food but in parallel, a place where people would want to gather, to feel good to chat and catch up about daily events, the 'Blu', important or not, like and unlike points of view

That was the vision and mission

Early on, it started to become clear that the ‘Human Right’ of customers could not be protected; The ‘Right to Life not to be deprived’

Blu Nite, fought hard to have the related matters remedied, without success, through, City of Melbourne, on through, the Victorian Ombudsman and now, the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The case, by its nature, technicality and illegalities, involves detail, which if you’d like to form your own view, summarises, per the documentation sets below, submitted to the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The Supreme Court of Victoria issued Judgment on 10 May 2017 and Orders the following day.which require I set out whu I'm not liable for Defendant(s) costs by 26 May 2017 with Arnold Bloch Leibler having already demanded I remove all of Blu Nite's equipment and setup which was not installed nor ever allowed to be altered by me.

In parallel, ZERVOS LAWYERS set the deadline of 11 May 2017with threatened Court Orders related to disclosures as to a claim to separation settlement made by Helen Raptis. I find myself unable to meet such deadlines as I'm prevented access to my property in Parkville where such doucumenation resides beyond which I've had my personal computer returned to me without its hard drives, again, those drives held documentation currently sought. ZERVOS LAWYERS have been so informed in line with their deadline of 11 May 2017 - 5PM

On the 15 September 2016, this Application was lodged with the Supreme Court of Victoria with its Originating Motion, that same month, September 2016, Helen Raptis now declares through ZERVOS LAWYERS, it was then we separated.

Helen Raptis then proceeds unlawfully, through ZERVOS LAWYERS, to have placed a Caveat upon my properties.

Full documentation - Helen Raptis - Divorse - Settlement

The Judgment of the Supreme Court of Victoria is to be found online at the Law Library - VSC 247 & Austlii - VSC 247

Feel welcome to express a view if you like. Do so by email at welcome@blunite.com.au and it will be posted with my response, on this page

 

Thanasis Raptis
Blu Nite
14 May 2017

Read more - Summary Overview

Quick links;

Read more - How I'm affected

Read more - What I seek

 

Recent documentation;

 

DATE DOCUMENT NO
     
30-08-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - JUDGMENT - 2017-08-17
62
31-08-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - GENERAL FORM OF ORDER - 2017-08-31
63
01-09-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - JUDGMENT - HEARING - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-08-30
64
01-09-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - JUDGMENT - HEARING - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-08-31
65
02-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - TRANSCRIPT NOT OF HIGH QUALITY - 2017-09-02
66
02-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - TRANSCRIPT NOT OF HIGH QUALITY - 2017-09-02 - SIGNED
67
06-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - JURISDICTIONAL AND MISCONDUCT EVIDENCE - 2017-09-06
68
06-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - JURISDICTIONAL AND MISCONDUCT EVIDENCE - 2017-09-06 - SIGNED
69
15-09-17
AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - 2017-09-15
70
15-09-17
AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - 2017-09-15 - SIGNED
71
     
     
06-09-17
WEBSITE - HOMEPAGE - PRINT FILE - 2017-09-06
 

 

All documentation;

 

Download the entire document set

PRINT-FILE-2017-09-16

 

DATE DOCUMENT NO
     
15-09-16 INITIAL AFFIDAVIT - 2016-09-15 1
15-09-16 EXHIBITS -  2016-09-15 2
15-09-16 ORIGINATING MOTION BETWEEN PARTIES - 2016-09-15 3
15-09-16 SUMMONS ON ORIGINATING MOTION - 2016-09-15 4
29-09-16
CONDITIONAL APPEARANCE - FORM 8B - 2016-09-29
5
13-10-16 AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES GEORGE GARDINER - 2016-10-13 6
14-10-16 SUPREME COURT - TRANSCRIPT - 2016-10-14 7
14-10-16 SUPREME COURT DIRECTIONS HEARING - ORDERS - 2016-10-14 8
28-10-16 NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2016-10-28 9
07-11-16 SUPREME COURT APPEAL - RULING - 2016-11-07 10
09-11-16 SUMMONS - CITY OF MELBOURNE - 2016-11-09 11
10-11-16 AFFIDAVIT OF PHILLIP RICHARD GARRETT - 2016-11-10 12
10-11-16 SUMMONS - 333 CHOICE PROPERTIES PTY LTD - 2016-11-10 13
14-12-16 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – 2016-12-14 14
04-01-17 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – 1 of 3 - LEASE - 2017-01-04 15
16-01-17 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – C GARDINER - 2017-01-16 16
02-02-17 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – 2 of 3 – ARTICULATION 17
03-02-17 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – C GARDINER - 2017-02-03 18
13-02-17 CHARLES GARDINER - NO RESPONSE - NOT LODGED - 2017-02-13 19
27-02-17 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – 3 of 3 - VEXATION AND SIGNATURES - 2017-02-27 20
21-02-17 SIGNATURE EXAMINATION INSTRUCTION IN THE NAME OF D B SMITH - 2017-02-21 21
27-02-17 CHARLES GARDINER - NO RESPONSE - NOT LODGED - 2017-02-27 22
02-03-17 333 CHOICE PROPERTIES PTY LTD - OUTLINE OF SUBMISSIONS - 2017-03-02 23
06-03-17 CITY OF MELBOURNE - OUTLINE OF SUBMISSIONS - 2017-03-06 24
06-03-17 SUPREME COURT - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-03-06 25
06-03-17 SUPREME COURT - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-03-06 - AMENDED 26
23-03-17 AFFIDAVIT (RESPONDING) – TRANSCRIPT - AUDIO RECORING SOUGHT - 2017-03-23 27
31-03-17 SUPREME COURT - AUDIO RECORDING - RULING - 2017-03-31 28
11-04-17 AFFIDAVIT - RULING - 2017-04-11 29
11-04-17 EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE - NIGEL COOPER - AFFIDAVIT - RULING - 2017-04-11 30
10-05-17 SUPREME COURT - JUDGMENT- 2017-05-10 31
10-05-17 CHARLES GARDINER - COURT CORRESPONDENCE - 2017-05-10 32
11-05-17 SUPREME COURT - JUDGMENT- ORDERS - 2017-05-11 33
12-05-17 KIM WOOD - COURT CORRESPONDENCE - 2017-05-12 34
19-05-17 CAM TROUNG - COUNCIL - ARNOLD BLOCH LEIBLER - 2017-05-19 35
24-05-17
NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-05-24
36
26-05-17 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) – NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-05-26 37
29-05-17 NOTICE OF APPEAL AGAINST ORDER OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE - 2017-05-29 - SIGNED 38
29-05-17 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) DAMIAN BALLAN – ZERVOS LAWYERS – 2017-05-29 - SIGNED 39
29-05-17 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) ZERVOS LAWYERS – ARNOLD BLOCH LEIBLER– 29 MAY 2017 - SIGNED 40
29-05-17 NOTICE OF APPEAL AGAINST ORDER OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE - 2017-05-29 - STAMPED PAGES 41
30-05-17 Damian Ballan - 2017-05-30 42
30-05-17 SUPREME COURT - JUDGMENT- ORDERS - 2017-05-30 43
01-06-17 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-06-01 - LODGED 44
06-06-17 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-06-06 45
07-06-17 64A - LEAVE TO APEAL - 2017-06-07 46
15-06-17 AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-06-15 47
22-06-17 46A SUMMONS - NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-06-22 48
23-06-17 GENERAL FORM OF ORDER - ARNOLD BLOCH LEIBLER - 2017-06-23 49
23-06-17 DIRECTIONS HEARING - ORDERS - 2017-06-23 50
23-06-17 SUPREME COURT - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-06-23 51
29-06-17 PLAINTIFF’S SUBMISSIONS IN SUPPORT - 2017-06-29 52
12-07-17 OUTLINE OF SUBMISSIONS ON APPEAL - T ACREMAN - COUNCIL - 2017-07-12 53
14-07-17 SECOND DEFENDANT'S SUBMISSIONS IN RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2017-07-14 54
26-07-17 PLAINTIFF’S SUBMISSIONS IN REPLY - 2017-07-26 55
15-08-17 AFFIDAVIT - SUPPORTING - PLAINTIFF’S SUBMISSIONS IN REPLY - 2017-08-15 56
15-08-17 AFFIDAVIT - SUPPORTING - PLAINTIFF’S SUBMISSIONS IN REPLY - 2017-08-15 - SIGNED COVER 57
15-08-17 AFFIDAVIT - SUPPORTING - PLAINTIFF’S SUBMISSIONS IN REPLY - 2017-08-15 - FEDERAL - SEAL 58
17-08-17
SUPREME COURT - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-08-17
59
21-08-17
AFFIDAVIT - AUDIO RECORING SOUGHT - 2017-08-21
60
21-08-17
AFFIDAVIT - AUDIO RECORDING SOUGHT - 2017-08-21 - SIGNED COVER
61
30-08-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - JUDGMENT - 2017-08-17
62
31-08-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - GENERAL FORM OF ORDER - 2017-08-31
63
01-09-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - JUDGMENT - HEARING - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-08-30
64
01-09-17
SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - JUDGMENT - HEARING - TRANSCRIPT - 2017-08-31
65
02-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - TRANSCRIPT NOT OF HIGH QUALITY - 2017-09-02
66
02-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - TRANSCRIPT NOT OF HIGH QUALITY - 2017-09-02 - SIGNED
67
06-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - JURISDICTIONAL AND MISCONDUCT EVIDENCE - 2017-09-06
68
06-09-17
AFFIDAVIT - JURISDICTIONAL AND MISCONDUCT EVIDENCE - 2017-09-06 - SIGNED
69
15-09-17
AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - 2017-09-15
70
15-09-17
AFFIDAVIT (SUPPORTING) - 2017-09-15 - SIGNED
71
     
     
06-09-17
WEBSITE - HOMEPAGE - PRINT FILE - 2017-09-06
 

 

Download the entire document set

PRINT-FILE-2017-09-16

 

RELATED LINKS;

 

Victorian Ombudsman

Victorian Ombudsman - Building Surveyors

Supreme Court of Victoria - Preliminary